Oddly enough being richer doesn't make a person superior in
one's book. Even though some do seem to think that counts. Personally one
thinks that is a different issue altogether, but that isn't what this is about.
This is about the idea that one gender is superior to another and you will note
that those criteria are not based on some nebulous gender role.
Overall men might be faster and stronger, but it doesn't
always make them smarter. Now round here He is faster, smarter and generally
superior in strength... apart from that little gym episode... but we don't talk
about that. The
reality is that in a gym one can out lift Him on some equipment. Of course He
can move his mothers TV that weighs in at more than 50 kg while one struggles
to lift an end of the damn thing.
This is offset by the fact that He is disorganised, unless
it is something that really interests him, and completely oblivious to his
environment. Now that is an area that one can shine in... when allowed. There
are also those unfortunate squirrel genes that make Him something of a hoarder
by nature... again an arena that one can manoeuvre in... eyes off His wardrobe
once more
All of that doesn't make Him superior. It makes us differently abled and complimentary.
It also makes Him a perfectly normal flawed human being who
can run one into the ground. He was blessed with that explosive speed thing...
Bastard!
4 comments:
I suspect that I can run faster than my Master.... hmm, not that I'd every try to run off...
So ... if I've always been able to lift and carry more than most of the men surrounding me troughout life (and I'm generally smarter than most people I know)--does this make me a superiour to those who are, supposedly, "superiour in principle"? ;)
@Dina You are simply a super being and sharper than most :D
The concept of "male superiority" is good for one thing. Trolling "Masters" in chatrooms. But then I am a male sub who likes to subvert everything they believe about the world :)
Post a Comment