What is interesting about the debate, to one small slave at
any rate, is at what point can you no longer call a relationship M/s? Is it
when you actually haven't met? Is it when you do not reside together? Is it
when you have removed key features of it out... things like obedience,
dominance, control or x? If we can make these relationships whatever we want,
then where do we draw the line?
Chatting to Him it was soon apparent that where his line was
placed was in a very different spot from one's own. He acknowledged online
relationships, whereas one small slave thinks that there is a vast difference
between online and having someone in your grill 24/7. As one pointed out most that
do move in soon concede there is a huge adjustment period due to that very
thing. But maybe the divergence between us is that from a master's point of
view, there isn't so much of a difference as there is from a slave's.
They are still issuing orders that are being obeyed...
prepared to give the benefit of the doubt here and assume that both parties are
being honest in their dealings with each other... and that the relationship
doesn't end the minute that the computer screen is turned off. There is still
the opportunity to delve into someone's mind to make little tweaks and subtle
changes. The levels of adoration are still the same... in fact it may be more
intense due to that not being in their grill thing... bad, bad slave for
suggesting such a thing J
Meh these are the things that slip around the mind during
morning mouse. As always there are more questions than answers...
It's all your fault...
Bitches!
2 comments:
M/s without obedience is like making tea without the tea leaves. Just some hot water. Maybe with lemon.
You! You were one of those responsible for this ;)
Post a Comment